Trying this site for #econometrics advice:
I have a T=2 panel and I want to estimate the effect of a continuous treatment. The outcome has strong regression to the mean (cor(y2-y1,y1) = -0.5). In the simple binary treatment case the FE model in differences is
y2 - y1 = d*treat + e
and LDV is
y2 = b*y1 + d*treat + e, so if b != 0 the differenced model is misspecified. But with continuous treatment this is not as simple. Does regression to mean imply you should always use a LDV model?
7.11.2022 14:35Trying this site for #econometrics advice: I have a T=2 panel and I want to estimate the effect of a continuous treatment. The outcome has...My #introduction I’m a Lecturer (Assistant Professor) at King’s College London where I teach economic history. I work mostly on 19th century financial history in the UK. Currently working on market structure on the London Stock Exchange, the Poor Law, and inflation. I have unreasonable views on 19th century share price lists.
I like #rstats, #stan and Bayesian stats generally. And have worked on social networks in economic history. Desperately trying to disentangle homophily and contagion.
6.11.2022 22:17My #introduction I’m a Lecturer (Assistant Professor) at King’s College London where I teach economic history. I work mostly on 19th...⬆️
⬇️