zoqoly - Network

My article "Non-Classical Beasts Under the Carpet: A Note On Carnap’s Non-Normal Models" has been published in...

My article "Non-Classical Beasts Under the Carpet: A Note On Carnap’s Non-Normal Models" has been published in Topoi.

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11245-024-10161-5
You can see the summary of the article in this image:

"Science is our ultimate arbiter of truth and existence" (?!)

"Science is our ultimate arbiter of truth and existence" (?!)

راسل کار وینر رو جدی نمیگیره چون فکر میکرده رابطه ها واقعی و فروکاست ناپذیرن.

راسل کار وینر رو جدی نمیگیره چون فکر میکرده رابطه ها واقعی و فروکاست ناپذیرن.

If a sentence is false, everything follows from it [EFQ].https://zoqol.github.io/gentzen/#I2M9KFxwaGk+Zik+KFxwaGk+XHpldGEp

If a sentence is false, everything follows from it [EFQ].

https://zoqol.github.io/gentzen/#I2M9KFxwaGk+Zik+KFxwaGk+XHpldGEp

You turn to vessels of crystal, I to the syllogism called "The Liar";#Epictetus

You turn to vessels of crystal, I to the syllogism called "The Liar";
#Epictetus

"In science nothing capable of proof ought to be believed without proof. "— Richard Dedekind

"In science nothing capable of proof ought to be believed without proof. "
— Richard Dedekind

David Liggins

David Liggins

David Lewis at the age of 14.

David Lewis at the age of 14.

It [David Lewis's theory of possible worlds] asks us to believe there are donkeys spatiotemporally unrelated to us. And there are none....

It [David Lewis's theory of possible worlds] asks us to believe there are donkeys spatiotemporally unrelated to us. And there are none. It's not so much that I object to the thesis that the number of donkeys is uncountably infinite; it is more that I object to the thesis that the number of donkeys spatiotemporally unrelated to us is other than 0.
—Peter van Inwagen

این هم به نوبه خودش جالبه که یکی از منطقای مهمی که بین جماعت فیلسوف زیاد ازش...

این هم به نوبه خودش جالبه که یکی از منطقای مهمی که بین جماعت فیلسوف زیاد ازش نام برده میشه (معروف به Belnap-Dunn) تو مقاله ای به نام
How a Computer Should Think
معرفی شده.

(p⊃q) or (q⊃p) is always true for random propositions p and q, it is ridiculous. https://zoqol.github.io/gentzen/#I2M9KHA+cSl8KHE+cCk=

(p⊃q) or (q⊃p) is always true for random propositions p and q, it is ridiculous.
https://zoqol.github.io/gentzen/#I2M9KHA+cSl8KHE+cCk=

Wójcicki, Ryszard

Wójcicki, Ryszard

“I think, therefore it is not the case that everything is not I.” (van Inwagen)

“I think, therefore it is not the case that everything is not I.” (van Inwagen)